Problem with storage of large const array

Thank you for your effort and the proof that it works as intended.

Meanwhile I found the problem. It was a stupid mistake of my own :mad:.
In my test I put a "volatile" in front of it in order not to get optimized out since I dind't have real code accessing the array yet. Too bad "volatile" worked as it should ... Without volatile and a bit of real code it worked.

Best regards
Frank